I
tried watching director Joe (Book of Shadows:
Blair Witch 2) Berlinger’s Netflix show about Ted Bundy, but I could
barely keep my eyes open during the first episode, so I never went back for
seconds. This biopic, also made by
Berlinger for Netflix is slightly more engaging, mostly due to Zac Efron’s
performance as one of America’s most notorious (and charming) serial killers.
Ted
dotes on his loving girlfriend (Lily Collins), who blindly returns his love,
even when he is accused of numerous brutal murders of young women and carted
off to jail. After numerous escapes, Ted
is finally detained in Florida where his trial is televised across the nation. As she becomes more and more emotionally
distant, another flame (Crawl’s Kaya Scodelario) comes to Ted’s aid and stands
by him in his moment of need.
Extremely
Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile is frustratingly vague when it comes to some
of the biggest aspects in the Bundy case.
We never see Bundy stalking his victims and killing them, which is an
odd miscalculation. I guess this was
done to spare the victims’ families or to avoid glamorizing Bundy’s
mythos. Berlinger is more interested in
how two very different women stand by their man even when it’s obvious to
anyone with half a brain he’s guilty as sin.
To that end, the movie only works in fits and starts.
It’s
hard to say if Berlinger wants us to sympathize with the women who love
Bundy. The filmmakers also curiously
sidestep much of his brutality, which further hampers the drama. I mean why watch something called Extremely
Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile if we never really see him do anything that
lives up to the lurid title?
It’s
also difficult to know who the movie was made for. Serial Killer fans and true-life crime
fanatics will probably be left cold because of the lack of forensic detail,
while those expecting a straight drama will undoubtedly feel a bit unsatisfied
by the clunky love triangle. The
courtroom scenes late in the film are certainly fun and have an energy to them
the rest of the flick lacks. That’s
thanks largely to the casting of John Malkovich as the hammy judge and Jim
Parsons as the squirrely prosecutor.
The
film is ambiguous about whether or not Bundy committed the crimes up until the
closing moments, which further adds to the frustration. Ambiguity certainly has its place in fiction,
but in a film about one of America’s most notorious serial killers--a man who
was tried, convicted, and eventually confessed to his crimes—ambiguity doesn’t
work. There’s a courtroom scene late in the game in which Bundy says something
to the effect of, “The man who you see today isn’t the man guilty of these
crimes”, perhaps suggesting he was a split personality or just plain out-and-out
lying. It’s like they want us to believe Bundy had an alter ego, but we never get
to see his other side. It’s like making
a movie about Clark Kent and only showing him as Superman in brief flashes in
the closing moments. Not that I’d
compare Bundy to Superman, although we all know if there was a Justice League
for serial killers, Bundy would definitely be the Superman. I mean he’s got the looks and all-American
charm for sure, and...
Okay,
I’m getting on a weird tangent here. Let’s
wrap this thing up…
Even
though much of the film is frustrating, it remains a fine showcase for
Efron. If nothing else, it allows the
actor to shed his squeaky-clean Disney image by playing a psycho like
Bundy. I just wish he was allowed to get
a little more down and dirty. Seeing him
hacking up unsuspecting women could’ve gone a long way from distancing himself
from that High School Musical crap.