Writer/director
Preston Sturges had a number of hits under his belt in the mid ‘40s and
practically had carte blanche in Hollywood.
He was a big Harold Lloyd fan and decided to make The Sin of Harold
Diddlebock as a comeback vehicle for him.
(Lloyd hadn’t appeared in a movie in over nine years at that point.) It sounded like a match made in Heaven, but unfortunately
for comedy fans, their styles never really mesh. The fact that the laughs are precious and few
makes the teaming of the two comedic titans even more disappointing.
The
film opens with the classic football game scene from The Freshman. It’s supposed to do two things simultaneously: Remind the audience of just how funny Lloyd
could be while also acting as cheap stock footage. Too bad there’s more laughs in the footage
from The Freshman than there is in the rest of the movie.
After
winning the big football game, Harold gets offered a lowly job with the promise
of an eventual promotion. Fast-forward
twenty years and he’s still stuck at the same desk. When he complains to the boss, he’s promptly
fired. Faced with few options, the
usually teetotaling Harold decides to go out and get drunk for the very first
time. He goes on a wild bender and
awakens from his drunken stupor surprised to learn he’s now in possession of a
failing circus. Harold then goes off on
a frantic search to pawn off the circus on someone else, but of course he gets
no takers.
The
best scene is when Harold goes into the bar and the overly eager bartender
played by Edgar (Duck Soup) Kennedy mixes him up a customized drink. Kennedy is quite funny in this scene, and it’s
a shame he wasn’t given more to do elsewhere in the picture. Other bits are played by such familiar faces
as Lionel Stander (as a bookie), Margaret Hamilton (as a maid), and Rudy Vallee
(as a potential investor).
The
rest of the picture is low on laughs and surprisingly light on the physical
comedy Lloyd is known for. I guess that’s to be expected, given the fact
that he was much older and hadn’t appeared in a movie in over a decade, but
still. He doesn’t give a bad performance
either. It’s just that the film itself
is rather lackluster. The big finale where
Harold tries to retrieve a lion from the ledge of a tall building is supposed
to evoke memories of the iconic Safety Last.
However, it just comes off as a hollow imitation and isn’t very funny to
boot.
The
film sorely lacks Sturges’ comedic touch too.
Sturges might’ve meant The Sin of Harold Diddlebock as a love letter to
Lloyd, but I think he would’ve been better off allowing Lloyd to direct the
picture as their sensibilities don’t quite gel.
Ultimately, its biggest sin is that it just isn’t very funny.
AKA: Mad Wednesday.
No comments:
Post a Comment