I
resisted seeing this remake of the 1988 horror classic in theaters (mostly
because it didn’t stay very long). I
love everyone’s favorite foulmouthed killer doll, Chucky. Heck, even the sloppy, uneven sequels are
endearing to me. It just seemed sacrilegious
to reboot the franchise, especially given the fact that no one from the
original was involved.
I’m
glad I waited a year or so to stream it in the comfort of my home because with
lowered expectations, it turned out to be a lot of fun. It’s just different enough from the original
to justify its existence while still retaining the nasty edge that makes the
series so great. It’s consistently funny
and has a cruel mean streak a mile wide.
Also, the gore that is just as over the top as some of the later
sequels. In short, it’s a legit Chucky flick.
The
bare bones of the original plot is the same. A single mom (Aubrey Plaza) gets a talking
doll for her son, Andy (Gabriel Bateman).
The big difference is that instead of being a riff on Cabbage Patch Kids
mania, this Chucky is sort of a walking, talking Alexa. This Child’s Play is less a parody on kiddie
consumerism and more of a parable about inviting seemingly harmless technology
into your home that will ultimately turn on you. That means Chucky can synch himself up to the
family’s devices and use the cloud to tap into everything from the house lights
to the Roomba to driverless cars to drones to wreak havoc on his victims.
Another
interesting change is that it’s not voodoo that causes the doll to become malevolent,
but a disgruntled employee who sabotages its wiring. What separates this iteration of Chucky from
the original series is that he’s not initially evil. In fact, his main goal is to protect Andy from
harm (or at least what he perceives to be harm.) He only goes psycho once he’s spurned by Andy,
who finds “real” friends. In fact, you
kind of feel bad for the little sucker, which is a compliment to the sharp
writing and the stellar vocal performance by none other than Mark Hamill. Hamill refuses to go over the top with the
character and manages to imbue Chucky with a hint of sympathy.
Naturally,
all that goes out the window once Chucky starts slicing and dicing. I’m happy to say that the gore is often
gnarly and some of the set pieces work better than you’d expect. I had mixed feelings about director Lars
Klevberg’s previous film, Polaroid, but there was enough there to suggest he
had potential. Child’s Play proves me
right. He gives the flick a sense of
style that helps set it apart from the original franchise and injects a fun
spirit that was more than appreciated by this horror fan. (The nods to other horror and genre classics
work very well.)
While
the film stops short of being a home run, it is consistently entertaining
throughout and Klevberg delivers a killer finale. As far as comparing the remake to the originals,
I’d say this is probably the third or fourth best one, which is high praise coming from such a dyed in the
wool Chucky fanatic. I enjoyed this one
so much that I am hopeful that both the original series and this new franchise
can coexist peacefully. I wouldn’t mind seeing
new entries in both universes for years to come.
No comments:
Post a Comment