I’ve heard so much about Ken Russell’s notorious film The Devils over the years that I guess I was bound to be somewhat disappointed by the time I actually saw it. That’s not to say it’s a bad movie. Far from it. It looks great, has some terrific acting, and memorable set pieces. It’s just far from the shocking spectacle I always pictured it to be.
Maybe that’s because the version on Shudder is the American cut. Apparently, the UK version is racier, but I guess us Yanks are too prudish to enjoy it. (Which is weird given all that “Video Nasty” shit the Brits go on and on about.) Even in its censored version, it’s still a solid flick.
Oliver Reed (who was also in Russell’s Tommy) stars as a priest with lust in his heart who knocks up a young virgin. Vanessa Redgrave is the hunchback nun who has the hots for him, but naturally, he doesn’t give her the time of day. Scorned, she plots her revenge by accusing him of witchcraft. Soon, the townsfolk the priest has enraged along the way also team up to have him tortured and executed as a heretic.
I’m sure The Devils was shocking as all get-out when it first came out. I think the best thing I can say about it is that it went on to inspire the “Nunsploitation” craze of the ‘70s as well as the skeevy likes of such exploitation favorites as Mark of the Devil. Any exploitation movie scholar should see it as this was the first of its kind (although The Conqueror Worm had similar witch hunting sequences, just without the religious overtones). However, the films it would later inspire are a lot more depraved and nastier if you ask me.
Reed is great as the boastful priest. His character is interesting because in a way, he kind of welcomes what’s coming to him if only so he can show his faith in God. He’s a fornicator and a cheat, but he’s not exactly evil as he bravely defends his village and his congregation from outsiders seeking to tear down the city walls. Redgrave is a hoot as the gnarled nun with a horny streak. Too bad I didn’t get to see the uncut version where she apparently gets it on with a human bone.
Because it is a Ken Russell film, it looks beautiful, has some impressive (sometimes exhausting) camerawork, and is gleefully over the top. However, it’s not particularly scary or shocking. I guess that all depends on your upbringing. If you were a choirboy, I’m sure it will all seem quite blasphemous. To someone like me who is well-versed in exploitation movies and gross-out horror, it was just another day at the office.
No comments:
Post a Comment